McConnell v FEC: Supreme Court: Scheduling Motions and OppositionsPlaintiff AFL-CIO's Response to Defendants' Motion for Expedited Briefing Schedule On June 3, p laintiff AFL-CIO filed this response to the defendants' motion for expedited briefing schedule. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Paul Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Expedite Briefing On June 2, the Paul plaintiffs filed this response to the defendants' motion to expedite briefing. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Adams Plaintiffs Response to the Motions for Expedited Briefing
Adams plaintiffs filed this response to the motions for expedited briefing. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Defendants' Reply in Support of its Motion for Expedited Schedule Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Defendants' Response to National Right to Life Committee's Opposition to Defendants' Proposed Motion for Expedited Schedule Click here to view the document in its entirity.
Defendants' Response to RNC's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Expedited Schedule Click here to review this document in its entirety.
Echols Plaintiffs Motion to Affirm Summarily On May 29, 2003, the Echols plaintiffs filed this motion asking the Court to summarily affirm the unanimous judgment of the district court that the Reform Act's provisions prohibiting minors from contributing to political campaigns was unconstitutional. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Plaintiff Chamber of Commerce, et al.'s Response to Defendants' Motion for Expedited Briefing Schedule On May 28, the business plaintiffs filed the following motion. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Motion of the Republican National Committee, et al. for Expedited Briefing Schedule On May 27, the Republican National Committee filed this motion with the U.S. Supreme Court to recommend several potential schedules for expedited briefing of McConnell v. FEC. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Response of McConnell Plaintiffs to Defendants' Motion to Expedite Briefing
In this May 27 filing, the McConnell group of plaintiffs agree to Defendants' proposed schedule for expedited briefing, but disagree with the suggested format for briefs. The plaintiffs suggest an alternative format. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
Defendants' Motion for Expedited Briefing On May 23, the U.S. Solicitor General, along with the other government defendants and the congressional sponsors of McCain-Feingold, filed this motion with the U.S. Supreme Court to recommend several potential schedules for expedited briefing of McConnell v. FEC. Click here to view the document in its entirety.
|
